's Forum Archives - Non-Cycling Discussions

Archive Home >> Non-Cycling Discussions(1 2 3 4 )

Dems have no shame(5 posts)

Dems have no shameLive Steam
Oct 1, 2003 7:44 AM
Chuck Schumer should go dig a hole and jump in. He has zero credability now. ZERO! This whole Wilson case is a sham and is going to backfire big time on the Dumocrats!

Novak's response to this BS should be taken at face value, which is worth a lot at this point!

Clifford May's editorial about this should certainly shed light on what is now going on in Washington!
easily rebuttedrufus
Oct 1, 2003 8:25 AM
if novak says now that administration sources didn't come to him with this story, why did he say in a july 22 interview that he "didn't seek out this information, this information came to him"? why is he changing his story now? or perhaps he wasn't one of the reporters that were called, but he had the same info foisted on to him anyway. either way, nothing changes the fact that "senior administration officials" leaked her name to him, in violation of the law.

as for clifford may. the fact that some ex-government official told him her name led him to "infer" that it was common knowledge in washington. sorry, but his "inferences" or "hunches" do not constitute fact.

from what i see on this board, i "infer" that Live Steam is a friggin' idiot. is this the truth, or might i be mistaken?
No No, LS is just misguided.MR_GRUMPY
Oct 1, 2003 8:32 AM
because he doesn't realize that george is a dope.
Your response speaks volumes about the ...Live Steam
Oct 1, 2003 8:42 AM
type of person you really are! But I'm not surprised. That type of response is typical from desperate liberals. They lambaste conservatives for being vindictive, hateful and slanderous, yet, like you did here, liberals use personal attacks in some lame attempt foist their opinions and beliefs upon those that choose to think for themselves. 'Nuff said! Previously I thought we could have civilized debate, but you go on my personal ignore list for being an a$$hole!!!
as someone once said"nah, don't take it personally!"rufus
Oct 1, 2003 10:08 AM
did i attack you personally? i thought i was merely "inferring", based on the information at my disposal. i guess in your world "infer" does mean something is so. i'm so sorry that my "inference " has upset you so.

seriously, when have you ever been interested in "civilized debate"? don't cry too hard, okay?