RoadBikeReview.com's Forum Archives - Non-Cycling Discussions
OK, here's one for a boring Friday: describe taste(13 posts)
|OK, here's one for a boring Friday: describe taste||AllisonHayes|
Jul 5, 2002 9:04 AM
|Describe the taste of:
1. a watermelon
2. ice cream
5. a hamburger
pick any one or do all of them...
|there are people who get paid for this||ColnagoFE|
Jul 5, 2002 9:19 AM
|I've seen specials...where the job is to taste existing product (say doritos) and decide on new conbinations. how does one prepare for such a career?
hard to describe taste with language but:
1. sweet, mildly citrus, cold
2. assuming vanilla--buttery, sweet, cold
3. buttery, salty, lemon
4. breadlike, slightly saline, fizzy, somewhat bitter
5. oily, meaty, salty, smoky
|there are people who get paid for this||AllisonHayes|
Jul 5, 2002 9:32 AM
|Aren't you describing merely the attributes of taste? For example, I cannot describe the "taste" of a watermelon. What is the watermelon's sweetness? How is its sweetness different from that of a papaya for example?
I just had a slice of a cold, crisp, juicy, sweet watermelon. But what exactly is its taste?
|I suppose there is a vocabulary for those who do this||ColnagoFE|
Jul 5, 2002 11:37 AM
|You can't escape language.|
|re: OK, here's one for a boring Friday: describe taste||DougSloan|
Jul 5, 2002 9:35 AM
|1. a watermelon "good"
2. ice cream "good"
3. lobster "very good"
4. beer "mostly good, if cold"
5. a hamburger "good, but better with bacon, bleu cheese, and mushrooms"
|Hah, harder than physics, metaphysics or chemistry isn't it?||AllisonHayes|
Jul 5, 2002 9:50 AM
|But of course it IS chemistry, physics and metaphysics isn't it?|
|wasn't hard at all||DougSloan|
Jul 5, 2002 9:55 AM
|You did not say *how* to describe the foods. I described them perfectly well. "Good" is a description, isn't it?
|sounds like a typical lawyer response to me...||AllisonHayes|
Jul 5, 2002 10:10 AM
|but can you describe "how" they taste?|
Jul 5, 2002 10:15 AM
|"Madame, *how* does your lobster taste?"
"It's very good, thank you."
|do they teach you guys tautologic reasoning in law school? nm||AllisonHayes|
Jul 5, 2002 10:35 AM
|no, no, no||DougSloan|
Jul 5, 2002 5:13 PM
|The point was that describing food as "good" is not limited to lawyers.
|A challenge for the bio-chemists||McAndrus|
Jul 5, 2002 11:32 AM
|I am not a chemist and have next-to-no background in chemistry. However, I do believe the answer to your question lies in bio-chemistry.
You can distinguish different tastes by describing how the taste buds of the tongue react to each food.
For instance, watermelon creates X quantity release of Y chemicals while ice cream causes a X-10 quantity release of Z chemicals.
That's the only scientific way. Any other way is purely subjective and relies on circular reasoning - watermelon is as sweet as muskmelon, ice cream is as sweet as cake, everything tastes like chicken, etc.
|think about wine||ColnagoFE|
Jul 5, 2002 11:39 AM
|I mean there is a whole language involved in describing wine...(ie...woody, tannic, berry notes etc.)|| |