|Poll: What LOOKS Prettier - Integrated or Standard Setup? >||Fez|
Nov 18, 2003 10:37 AM
|If you could choose either one on your custom/dream bike, what do you think looks better? Assume non-freakishly large frame tube sizes on either one.
1) Intergrated looks beautiful on the bottom with an integrated-specific fork. The lines are just so clean!
2) Conventional looks beautiful with a King headset on top, whereas an integrated setup just kind of abruptly ends up top.
|intergrated looks better prefer to ride conventional nm||andy02|
Nov 18, 2003 10:40 AM
|Standard looks much nicer, IMO (nm)||laffeaux|
Nov 18, 2003 10:59 AM
|Standard with integrated fork!||swvegg|
Nov 18, 2003 1:10 PM
|Looks awesome, check out Saturn's Tete de Course bikes last year.|
Nov 18, 2003 7:36 PM
|In my original post I said how good integrated looked down low and how good conventional looked up top.
I didn't think anyone combined the two. It looks really sharp!
|Remember when form followed function nm?||Tom C|
Nov 18, 2003 1:56 PM
|Remember when form followed function nm? - Agreed (nm)||innergel|
Nov 18, 2003 3:07 PM