|Polar S-710 vs. Ciclosport HAC 4||kinger|
Sep 17, 2002 6:56 AM
|Does anyone have experience with both of these computers/heart rate monitors? I am looking for something that includes cadence as well as having the option to download info to a computer for training purposes. The power function is not overly important but may be something I look into at a later time. What I'd like to hear is people's opinions on both of these. They go for about the same price so it comes down to functionality.
Thanks in advance.
|re: Polar S-710 vs. Ciclosport HAC 4||Lactate Junkie|
Sep 17, 2002 7:26 AM
|Go with the Polar. The HAC 4 is hard to use, the software is very poor compared to the Polar and the unit itself is ugly to boot. The HAC also has a bunch of stupid functions that no one but a geek would want. Finally, the power feature on the HAC 4 is a joke. It does not work with any degree of repeatability, which makes it IMHO totally worthless. The Polar power system doesn't seem to be as accurate as a Power Tap or an SRM but at least it is consistent from condition to condition.|
|Agree: Returned my ciclosport because of inaccuracies.nm||thatsmybush|
Sep 17, 2002 9:14 AM