RoadBikeReview.com's Forum Archives - General


Archive Home >> General(1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 )


why did trek change the oclv geometry for 2003?(1 post)

why did trek change the oclv geometry for 2003?collinsc
Aug 28, 2002 1:24 PM
2003 5900 (56cm)
hta: 73
sta: 73.3
rake: 4.0
trail: 6.2
wb: 99.1

2002 5900 (56cm)
hta: 73.8
sta: 73.5
rake: 4.1
trail: 5.7
wb: 98.6

so, more laid back and longer. should be great for ripping down hills right? what else?