|How fast (or slow) did the Tour riders go UP the mountains?||Fez|
Aug 6, 2002 7:10 AM
|Did they keep it in double digits? I do climbs far less steep than those in the Tour and I drop down to 9 mph regularly!|
Aug 6, 2002 7:29 AM
|Judging from reports from Phil and the riders' power outputs, it looks like they easily keep it in double digits, with the faster ones around 17 mph up 8% grades. Incredible.
Aug 6, 2002 8:05 AM
|have you ever noticed sometimes the people running alongside can easily keep up with them? I am sure they often get up to 17mph. However, I don't think many people could run uphill this fast. Thus, I would have to believe they spend some time in the lower double digits climbing.
Also, I would hazard a guess that the guys Lance is dropping do indeed get into the single digits occasionally.
|sounds about right nm||DougSloan|
Aug 6, 2002 8:12 AM
|I thought when Pantani set the record...||Ray Sachs|
Aug 6, 2002 9:22 AM
|on Alpe d'Huez a few years back he averaged 13mph or so. That's a bit steeper than a lot of climbs though, so 15ish is probably about right. Jeez, there are hilly rides I barely average that on for the whole ride!
|Alpe d'Hues is only 7.9% avg||cyclopathic|
Aug 6, 2002 10:04 AM
|but I think they went up the Galibier that day so it is absolutely stunning|
|We worked out the climb rate once ...||Humma Hah|
Aug 6, 2002 9:24 AM
|... in a TDF discussion a couple of years ago. I believe someone had data on Elephantino, and he climbs about 120 feet per minute, and Lance would be just slightly faster. Once you're in a serious sustined climb where wind speed is not dominating, rate of climb is probably a better indicator than road speed, because the grade is changing so much.
I belive we decided Doug Sloan was capable of about 80 at that point in his training, and I was typically hitting around 40 fpm on a good day.
|A little math practice...||bobwill|
Aug 6, 2002 9:43 AM
|Okay, so let's figure what, about an 8% slope. So he's moving 100 feet forward for every 8 feet he climbs. So, that's about 1000 horizontal feet per minute. As it's 100 * 80 / 8. Right???
Now, let's go back to good old Pythagorous who says AA + BB = CC.
C is unknown, A is 80, B is 1000. This still sounding reasonable?
So, 6400 + 1,000,000 = CC.
1,006,400 = CC
So, that's just over 1003 feet per minute, which is about 1/5 of a mile per minute. 60 / 5 = 12.
So, that's about 12 mph.
That was a fun little math exercise.
|when attack they go faster||cyclopathic|
Aug 6, 2002 10:16 AM