RoadBikeReview.com's Forum Archives - General


Archive Home >> General(1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 )


A new record for spacers!!!!!!!!!!!!!!(10 posts)

A new record for spacers!!!!!!!!!!!!!!tirider
Jun 14, 2002 9:18 PM
Scroll down to the picks of this tri bike on Ebay... can anyone beat this????????????
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1836094851
oof, + a riser stem and Syntace liftersloop
Jun 15, 2002 4:16 AM
there's an argument for a bad fitting from somebody
re: Holy Crap!!!Akirasho
Jun 15, 2002 4:23 AM
... the fork looks like a Reynolds Ouzo Pro Aero with a CF steerer... in which case... that is just WRONG!!!

Granted, Reynolds has made a few Pro Aeros with alloy steerers... but geeeeze, wonder who did the fitting on this??!!??

We abide.

Remain In Light.
why even use aerobars?feathers mcgraw
Jun 15, 2002 4:49 AM
A builder goes out of the way to use a short headtube and dropped top tube so you can get nice and low, and then someone does this to it. Geez.
Aw, now I've got a bad case of spacer envy (nm)Crankist
Jun 15, 2002 2:16 PM
Great 55cm frame! Perfect for the 7 foot tall triathlete!!!- nmcydswipe
Jun 15, 2002 2:59 PM
maybe sloping top tubes DO have a greater purpose?!Tig
Jun 15, 2002 3:23 PM
A taller head tube that slopes down for correct standover height would look a helluva' lot better than these mega-stack mutations of otherwise beautiful bikes.
maybe sloping top tubes DO have a greater purpose?!rufus
Jun 15, 2002 4:19 PM
but an old-fashioned quill stem would look even nicer!
Lead pipe for spacer??? nmbiknben
Jun 15, 2002 4:13 PM
Nothing to see hear!
What savage butchery!filtersweep
Jun 16, 2002 5:41 AM
Could be weight weenism gone mad. Some guy who is 6'4" didn't want any extra weight in the frame...