|WOW...what really long .....||markmark|
May 10, 2002 7:12 AM
|legs. Caad5 size 58cm for sell, and needing larger frame? Someone really stuck her with the wrong size, and such nice... look at her standover.
gotta get me one, caad5 that is..
|re: WOW...what really long .....||firstrax|
May 10, 2002 7:16 AM
|I didnt know you get spd compatible shoes with 2 inch heals.|
May 10, 2002 7:24 AM
|How long did you look up and down those legs? Nice pair they are.|
|Good catch that is NM||Lowend|
May 10, 2002 7:24 AM
|Legs? What legs?||MaRider|
May 10, 2002 5:11 PM
|All I could see was the bike.|
|I am amazed that you looked at her...||Wannabe|
May 10, 2002 7:39 AM
|how freakin tall is she? and does she have sisters?(nm)||merckx56|
May 10, 2002 7:47 AM
|Sorry - is there a bike in that picture? nm||muncher|
May 10, 2002 8:00 AM
|Not a photographer in the bunch.||Kristin|
May 10, 2002 8:11 AM
|Do you guys believe everything you see? You thought the CC chick was a cyclist...and this gurl tall...and Ron ...well that anyone thought anything mystifies me. Nice to see art of photography still isn't dead. Mr. Cello will know what I mean.|
|Sad thing is, it doesn't even take a photographer.||Spinchick|
May 10, 2002 8:19 AM
|But it's entertaining nonetheless.|
|Now wait a minuite there||muncher|
May 10, 2002 8:36 AM
|no-one said that Ron was tall and good-looking after he posted that photo.....|
May 10, 2002 9:49 AM
|maybe, but not anyone...||markmark|
May 10, 2002 11:12 AM
|commenting tall girl + small bike = bikeshop salesjerk(possibly). Just have had too may friends lately who were told an "in stock bike" was just their size!! Photo came from ebay, girl indicating lbs sold her a bike too large(it looked kinda obivious from the pic I thought, even with the 2" spd platforms), but I don't have special insider info like you I assume??
The CC chick ..Cello ???
I was only looking at the ebay, long leg, caad5, chick, auction pic, where were you looking??
May 10, 2002 2:03 PM
|Everyone is ooh'ing and ahh'ing over how tall this girl is. This photograph utilizes a fairly simple visual effect. Cameraman stands up on something tall and shoots down at the subject with a wide angle lense. Subject holds bike away from body. Suddenly she looks 7 feet tall next too that 58 cm frame. I'm sure she's tall, but not that tall. Though, if a 58 cm frame is too small for her, she must be tall indeed. But in the end its not really not as much about bikes as it is legs.
My reference to MrCelloBoy was because he is a photographer and would have seen the visual effect more quickly than most.
|actually she doesn't||cyclopathic|
May 10, 2002 4:30 PM
|look at the wheels they would have been distorted. The picture looks like an amateur, made with cheap focus free camera. The guy who was making pic must be really tall and stands pretty close.
my $.02 CP
PS you're not jealous are you?
|Of course I'm jealous||Kristin|
May 13, 2002 6:33 AM
|My legs haven't looked like that for 15 years. That's a pretty good exposure for a disposable!!|
|Where's her head? nm.||Mike P|
May 10, 2002 8:40 AM
|maybe she's a butterface....nm||chopper|
May 10, 2002 9:51 AM
|no probs...i would prefer a mermaid with a fish tophalf ;-) nm||Spirito|
May 10, 2002 10:13 AM
|d'oh! nm||JS Haiku Shop|
May 10, 2002 1:40 PM