RoadBikeReview.com's Forum Archives - General


Archive Home >> General(1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 )


Got my Colorado Cyclist Catalog today(23 posts)

Got my Colorado Cyclist Catalog todayRadicalRonPruitt
Apr 9, 2002 6:11 PM
What a picture!
Oh, not again!!(nm)JBurton
Apr 9, 2002 7:39 PM
re: Got my Colorado Cyclist Catalog todaysievers11
Apr 9, 2002 7:53 PM
Those little chicken legs look scrumptious, but can she climb with those twigs. She is '"gifted" in other areas, so, work on those legs and you can ride my ... uh ... bike any day.
Paging Kristin - Where's your promised picture??? (nm)Paul
Apr 10, 2002 5:22 AM
What picture would that be?Kristin
Apr 10, 2002 5:55 AM
I don'ta recall promisin' you no such picture!
It was sort of impliedPaul
Apr 10, 2002 11:07 AM
You said something like "if I was to wear my underware, would the guys fawn over me". Well, give us a chance, maybe you can replace the CC model.

Paolo
What picture would that be?RadicalRonPruitt
Apr 10, 2002 1:49 PM
Yes you did. I remember it well.
me too!heloise
Apr 10, 2002 5:38 AM
only i musta received the "female specific" version.
these new "shorts" look pretty darn impractical...but who cares?
you can tell he's a cyclist because he's so tanned and toned. ;)
you owe me a new keyboard.muncher
Apr 10, 2002 5:43 AM
I just vomited on mine.
Which cycling catalog did that come out of baby? (nm)Kristin
Apr 10, 2002 5:54 AM
Gross!gregario
Apr 10, 2002 6:13 AM
Ohhhhh GROSS! But thanks Kristin, I can't stop laughing....but i really don't think the Colorado Cyclist model was dressed THAT skimpily. i would welcome finding her an outfit that reavealing though!
whoops!gregario
Apr 10, 2002 6:16 AM
sorry, i meant thanks (sort of) to Heloise.
You know, I don't need to look at that, but, to paraphrasebill
Apr 10, 2002 6:13 AM
Voltaire, I may not agree with what you drool over, but I will defend to the death your right to drool.
Rock on, heloise.
I didn't need to see it, either.RoyGBiv
Apr 10, 2002 6:55 AM
Especially while having my coffee and bagel.
Nice sit-bones! (nm)rideslikeagirl
Apr 10, 2002 7:02 AM
Sexist Pigs!Slipstream
Apr 10, 2002 7:09 AM
I am shocked, mortified right down to my joke strap. How dare you wimmin turn this board into a jerryspringerhowardstern mockery. This is not a bun board! I demand equal treatment.

Actually, you go girls: don't take these guys lying down; stand up for your rights! Give it right back! Yeh! Yeh! Yeh!

LOL ;>)
where'd you get my picture?merckx56
Apr 10, 2002 7:14 AM
you said you'd never show it to anyone! can't trust a woman!
Proof's in the puddin', honey - c'mere! (nm)rideslikeagirl
Apr 10, 2002 7:28 AM
Great.Sintesi
Apr 10, 2002 8:08 AM
Now I'm going to get fired for surfing gay porn at work. : (
i'm sick. nmcolker
Apr 10, 2002 8:09 AM
nm
Is that a prototype TREK "seatbag"? NMRayBan
Apr 10, 2002 10:05 AM
this is just getting pathetic now (nm)ColnagoFE
Apr 10, 2002 7:35 AM
re: I'm simple not understanding the hoopladatguyski
Apr 10, 2002 10:50 AM
As a long time CC customer I just received my catalog. The
cover was refreshing and a break from the usual covers of
bikers riding in the mountains and studly bike guys in the
latest fashion. I am dumbfounded that certain people acutally find this cover offensive. When compared to mags
like Cosmopolitan, Glamour, Shape, Self, etc. the cover
is far more tame....and these are women's mags. Further,
I don't see captions like '21 Sex Secrets' or 'A better body
by summer' like I see in YOUR magazines. Finally, my wife
just received her Atheletica catalog in the past
couple weeks. A barely clothed lady with a surfboard on the
cover.....what do you think??? More sexual exploitation???
Oh, I forgot....just like the mags listed above, its a women's catalog...

I think that you may be either imposing double standards in
your analysis....or you may just be a feminist sexist.

Either way, I could care less. Hey CC.....looks great....