Mar 3, 2002 8:51 AM
|Igonore this guy. Obviously the more we respond to his cognitive diarrhea the more he likes it and his sick need for attention is fed. I shouldn't even have acknowledged his existence with this message, but I say enough already.|
|re: Boycott cosmicallyconscience!||DrPete|
Mar 3, 2002 9:17 AM
|I'll join. I fell into the trap of trying to talk sense into someone who isn't capable of hearing it. So I will boycott cosmicallyconscience from here on out, and just observe and be amused.
Meanwhile, I'll be waiting for my $6000 to fall from the sky so I can go to my LBS and order up the sweetest Trek Project One that has ever been created. That'll happen when hell freezes over and cosmicallyconscience stops ranting. :)
|re: Boycott cosmicallyconscience!||cosmicallyconscience|
Mar 3, 2002 9:18 AM
|I am sorry you feel that way about the most serious discussion to have been discussed on this board.|
|I'm in! (nm)||Dave Hickey|
Mar 3, 2002 9:19 AM
|But he's convinced me to but that piggy SUV... Mmmm....SUV.||Crankist|
Mar 3, 2002 9:43 AM
Mar 3, 2002 10:13 AM
|I have to say this is not a schoolyard where we bully by omission. This is supposed to be a forum, you know, forum i.e. discussion, dialogue, intelligent debate. If you don't like what someone has to say debate, offer rejoinder or make your own mind up not to respond.
I would ask that "cosmically conscience" keep his strictly not bicycle posts for the "non-cycling" forum. Otherwise, I will welcome his perspective on cycling issues broad and specific.
Mar 3, 2002 11:05 AM
|exactly, we ignore him when he posts things on the general board that have nothing at all to do with cycling...I'd ignore him on the non-cycling board as well if I read it because his grammer is atrocious and his logic is flawed, therefore he does not promote 'intelligent debate' he just irritates people.|
Mar 6, 2002 12:25 AM
They don't teach Logic at those liberal arts schools in California.
|okay let me get this straight||salmonwheel|
Mar 3, 2002 11:11 AM
|We are free to buy what ever we want, because it's our right, continue destructive processes, because it's our right and with the free market economy that means if it sells it must be good, right. But if someone posts in a way we don't like we should focus our efforts to remove them. I don't get it. If you don't like his posts don't reply. But it seems people are so eager to assuage their guilty conscious that they can't let it go. Boycotting Trek for giving the president a bike is stupid, but boycotting the right of someone to say we should boycott Trek is even stupider (grammatical error is on purpose for emphasis, please do not reply with your automated spell checkers). Do we really need to start building alliances here? I think his posts are bike related although his arguments are often accusatory, and his logic is flawed. |
salmonwheel, the meat eating, pro-forestry environmentalist.
|CC's posts were strictly an attempt to get attention.||GW|
Mar 3, 2002 11:38 AM
|He was successful and all the little fish rose to the bait. It's sad but amusing that he can get such a reaction.
As a casual observer of this board it never fails to amaze me how petty and juvenile many of the members are. CC may be a twit but he played the suckers well.
|If flawed logic was the among the criteria for...||Djudd|
Mar 3, 2002 11:40 AM
|posting, a lot of posts would be rendered invalid. The same can be said for misspellings and syntax. Speaking of flawed logic a reply to "Cosmicallyconscience's" boycott Trek post is "Al Gore is a piece of S..." (the word is spelled out) and there or other posts following this using the same reply!!! This is logic? Why is no one calling for boycotts of these type of posts and replies? Personally the ad hoc screen names made up for the purpose of using invective and personal attacks smack of cowardice to me.|
|re: Boycott cosmicallyconscience!||DEANguy|
Mar 4, 2002 1:03 PM
|Gee, I have been away too long. Where did this individual come from. After reading those posts, I believe "cosmicallyconscience" should change his name to "comicallyunconscience".|
|Is "cosmicallyconscience" really "Cherry1" ??||coonass|
Mar 4, 2002 5:20 PM
|The deluge of stupid questions and comments from this/these authors makes me suspect that the DNA codes would be a perfect match..|| |