|crank length-what's too long?||maurizio|
Feb 8, 2002 8:19 AM
|I just acquired a bike through a trade and it's equipped with shorter cranks than what I was riding. The bike fits me better, but I can't seem to get on top of the gear as I did with my old frame. I'm wondering if the shorter cranks might play any role.
I've been riding 175mm for 10 years, but this bike has 172.5. I know this is probably more mental than anything.
What is the longest crank I could ride without hurting my knees and/or spin?
I'm 5'10", 159#. My race weight is near 150. The bike is a 58cm.
I've heard of riders my height riding 180's (Lance A. being one of them)...
|what's too long?||allervite|
Feb 8, 2002 11:01 AM
|Depends on your style. No hard and fast rule. If you are a spinner, you will like the shorter cranks. If you are a masher, you will like the longer cranks. Track racers like em small; climbers like em big. If you love the 175's stay with em.|
|re: crank length-what's too long?||guido|
Feb 8, 2002 11:26 AM
|If your legs are used to 175 you could just go with that, especially if you can feel the difference with 172.5. Lots of pros 5'8"-5'10" spin 175s. Had a friend who went from 172.5 to 180. it took his legs a season to get used to spinning them, but he could power up hills better on them, and liked them alot.