|Getting first Road bike: Trek 200 vs. GT ZR 2.0||DougS|
Jul 24, 2001 11:32 AM
|I like both bike and each has components which are comporable. Any ideas or suggestions you might have I would appreciate it!|
|re: Getting first Road bike: Trek 200 vs. GT ZR 2.0||Car Magnet|
Jul 24, 2001 3:56 PM
|Pricing? The GT 2.0 should be outfitted a little better with the carbon fork, threadless headset and Ultegra components. I think the Trek has Shimano 105 or the Tiagra/105 mix. Both are aluminum, but the GT's rear triangle looks real stiff (may not be the best for long rides). Have you ridden either? I think if all things are equal (ride comfort, price, etc) the GT is the better deal. But I would take a look around on the web, there were some posters that mentioned some great deals on both Ti and steel. Good Luck.|
|re: Getting first Road bike: Trek 200 vs. GT ZR 2.0||Maui|
Jul 24, 2001 7:03 PM
|I haven't ridden the Trek, but I have the GT 3.0 frame and fork built with full Ultegra. It's a very fast and comfortable ride for about 50 or 60 miles. Unfortunately, my body gets a little abused on centuries because of the stiff frame.
If you're not planning on riding too many centuries, it's a wonderful bike. However, I'd think about a more forgiving ride if you really like the 100 milers.