RoadBikeReview.com's Forum Archives - Cyclo-Cross


Archive Home >> Cyclo-Cross(1 2 3 )


Jamis Nova '01 or '02???(7 posts)

Jamis Nova '01 or '02???weskimad
Sep 18, 2002 6:35 PM
Mostly similar, but the '01 has a Cromoly Spinner fork and Mavic T221 w/Tiagra hubs, the '02 has a Kinesis Crosslight AL fork and Mavic MA3 w/Ritchey hubs. The '02 is a hundred bucks more. I'm approx 200 lb and will use the bike mostly for commuting. Is the '02 worth the money? Thanks
re: Jamis Nova '01 or '02???Drupa
Sep 18, 2002 6:42 PM
Based on color alone, I would get the '01

Otherwise 6 of one...
ditto .. love that <b><font color=#FF3F00>ORANGE!</font></b> nmGlowBoy
Sep 20, 2002 11:37 AM
re: Jamis Nova '01 or '02???BAM
Sep 19, 2002 4:16 AM
Have you ridden both? Which fork do you like the ride of? Spinner forks tend to be heavy and have an unimpressive ride. The kinesis fork is lighter and has a nice ride to it.
I haven't ridden bothweskimad
Sep 19, 2002 4:40 AM
This would be an internet purchase, which is one reason I'd like some feedback. I haven't found a LBS nearby that even stocks a cyclecross, let alone Jamis. I loved the ride of my old Cernturion Ironman (tange #1 with a steel fork). It comes down to a $100 premium for the ritchey hubs and kineses fork.
get the '01 and invest in . . .Jakob
Sep 19, 2002 10:37 AM
A can of Framesaver and a new powder coat. My mid-level Jamis MTB frame had super soft paint and it was chipped all over the place in about 5 months of moderate use. It was a frame from 2000, but if they still have paint that's that bad, I would get the cheaper one and repaint that bad boy. The '02 colors are actually not that bad in person. The photo on the site doesn't really do it justice, but I would still get the '01.
re: Jamis Nova '01 or '02???jrm
Sep 20, 2002 7:26 AM
IMO: the upgrade in the fork ($124 aftermarket) and rims ($159 as a wheelset after market)are well worth justifying the $100 increase in price.