|Regular SLR vs. SLR Trams Am||opencl|
Oct 18, 2002 5:10 PM
|Anyone tried both of these saddles yet? I have the regular SLR and it's very comfortable... even for 5-6hour rides and centuries... I am thinking of switching to the SLR trans am for the magic cut-out hahaha
Besides for a little extra weight, is it as comfortable as the regular SLR?
|Why switch if the current one is very comfortable...||JL|
Oct 19, 2002 4:57 AM
|Plus the cutouts in seats are based upon dubious information at best.
Stick with what works.
|Why switch if the current one is very comfortable...||opencl|
Oct 19, 2002 12:59 PM
|For peace of mind. Cut outs definitely relief the pressure going to the arteries/veins. The extra pressure might be insignificant in causing EDF, but still..... better safe than sorry...|
|THe trans Am had thicker rails when I bought.....||rtyszko|
Oct 19, 2002 7:52 AM
|which limited the type of seat post that I could run. Subsequently I have a really nice easton carbon post sitting in my garage taking up shelf space.
|THe trans Am had thicker rails when I bought.....||opencl|
Oct 19, 2002 1:02 PM
|Since you said the trans am have thicker rails, I assume that you have both the regular SLR and the trans am SLR? How do they compare in terms of comfort level?|
|Basically the same, but I have a skinny butt so I needed more...||rtyszko|
Oct 20, 2002 4:08 AM
|cushining. NOw any time that my butt gets sore at least I don't wonder if I bought the saddle with the most cush.